I don’t know when everybody decided “their government does bad things = they should die” was a woke take

It’s okay to kill hundreds of thousands of people of a different ethnicity and religion than you just as long as you don’t hate gay people?

Man the bar is fuckin low

When did “I’m thick as mud” become a viable political argument?

Me when a guy in a white supremacist administration makes a nazi salute and the ADL goes “no, it wasn’t”

Me when an interest group which for decades has cried out against genocide and targeted ethno-religious persecution actively and deliberately proclaims it is going to eliminate an entire ethno-religious group from a large area of land

Me when people are defending that

Doing something political for years and then NOT doing something political is not “politically neutral,” you’re actively decided to make a politically motivated decision instead of simply continue with existing behavior.

I kind of wonder what Chenoweth, a they/them in a LGBTQ relationship, thinks about Stonewall?

That’s because every version of Windows since XP has been kind of dogshit

Oh I have literally thought of this too. Maybe a bit more like Cops or if The Office was a real paper company office… but at a software company. So many fires to put out, so many blockers, so much drama between design / pm / dev / qa / execs, etc. Launch date blockers. Post-release hotfix nightmares. It could work

I’m really torn on that. Because I want media to be unbiased, but I also want media to tell the truth.

Most media will simply report the truth of what other people say is the truth.

I suppose I’d opt for unbias over bias if those were the two options.

We need the actual “it was actually done” versus “the circumstances were created such that it could have been done”

I would ask her to correlate them with existence of violent movements alongside.

The MLK-Malcolm X dichotomy

In short, the presence of a militant option alongside your nonviolent option is quite useful in compelling the opposition to your side because the other option is the militant one.

Meanwhile you can still get away with most of what you learned in Java 1.4.

I think you’d get better traction out of this if it said quantum mechanics

That’s a very good move! To counter, you should follow these three principles:

• Prepare a response move that will prevent a future good move.

• Defend your own pieces and try to attack theirs.

• Don’t be too eager to sacrifice pieces in order to make short term gains.

• Be prepared to sacrifice an unimportant piece to make a good gain.

If you want to make a good move, try Rook H8 -> G7.

Dark Crystal vibes

You mean blaming leftists?

Is that your general experience with people doing dumb things? That they only do it once?

I think the best outcome would be that it might uncover deliberate malfeasance that might prompt some folks in congress to do what is needed. I wouldn’t be optimistic though.

Slightly more likely is that such discovery would drive the public towards a congressional swing away from his enablers at the next congressional election next year, assuming we have it. I’m moderately more optimistic on that, apparently such a swing is already forming, but to what extent isn’t clear.

We can’t undo the election results, the congressional count done on jan 6 is definitive.

Nearly every respectable major news outlet that has commentary tries to invite commentary from multiple sides. They also probably didn’t know what he would become or his ulterior motives.

I remember asking a few weeks after the election if anyone at all was talking about it being rigged. It seemed at the time everyone just accepted the result. Only in the past month or so have I started seeing talk of it.